(unnamed)

ccv_6a189e1b0a5f

Venue confidence 0.30

Location confidence 0.75

Category confidence 0.50

Sport confidence 0.90

What and where

Type: COURT
Kind: tennis court
Sports: tennis
Indoor / outdoor: Unknown
Ownership: Unknown
Coordinates: 33.893568, 35.497104
Location precision: centroid
Address: Unknown
Neighbourhood: Unknown
City / town: Unknown
District: Beirut
Governorate: Beyrouth
Postal code: Unknown

Contact and operation

Operator: Unknown
Phone: Unknown
Website: Unknown
Email: Unknown
Opening hours: Unknown
Booking URL: Unknown
Membership required: Unknown
Free to use: Unknown
Permanently closed: Unknown
Rating: Unknown — no source we may store one from

Reviewer controls

What you set here is recorded as a human decision and survives every future refresh — the pipeline is not allowed to overwrite it.

Sports played here

tennis

This record

Physical characteristics

Nothing known. Surface, court size, counts, lighting and facilities are only recorded when a source states them — none did for this venue.

Claim status

Status: unclaimed
Origin: ingested
Sources: 1 provider(s), 1 record(s)

Nobody has claimed this venue. It exists regardless — a venue is a fact about the world.

What you can do here

1 sport on this venue. Each one shows how confident we are and why — hover a chip for the evidence.

TennisConfirmed

Where each of these came from

Sport	Format	How we know	Confidence	Source
tennis	—	osm lists this venue under tennis.	0.90	osm

Sports are canonical claims, so they may only come from a source licensed to make one. OpenStreetMap (share-alike) and Google Places (restricted) can never appear in this table — the database rejects the write.

Possible duplicates

Place	Verdict	Distance	Name match	Why
(unnamed)	PROBABLE MATCH	196 m	1.00	names mostly agree, close together
(unnamed)	PROBABLE MATCH	264 m	1.00	names mostly agree, close together
(unnamed)	MANUAL REVIEW	858 m	1.00	similar names within the same area
(unnamed)	MANUAL REVIEW	339 m	1.00	similar names within the same area
(unnamed)	MANUAL REVIEW	1938 m	1.00	similar names within the same area
(unnamed)	MANUAL REVIEW	1930 m	1.00	similar names within the same area
(unnamed)	MANUAL REVIEW	1265 m	1.00	similar names within the same area
(unnamed)	MANUAL REVIEW	1491 m	1.00	similar names within the same area
(unnamed)	MANUAL REVIEW	1907 m	1.00	similar names within the same area
(unnamed)	MANUAL REVIEW	1251 m	1.00	similar names within the same area
(unnamed)	MANUAL REVIEW	1034 m	1.00	similar names within the same area
(unnamed)	MANUAL REVIEW	1867 m	1.00	similar names within the same area
(unnamed)	MANUAL REVIEW	1185 m	1.00	similar names within the same area
(unnamed)	MANUAL REVIEW	1160 m	1.00	similar names within the same area
(unnamed)	MANUAL REVIEW	1771 m	1.00	similar names within the same area
(unnamed)	MANUAL REVIEW	1812 m	1.00	similar names within the same area
(unnamed)	MANUAL REVIEW	1955 m	1.00	similar names within the same area
(unnamed)	MANUAL REVIEW	1600 m	1.00	similar names within the same area
(unnamed)	MANUAL REVIEW	1882 m	1.00	similar names within the same area
(unnamed)	MANUAL REVIEW	1390 m	1.00	similar names within the same area
(unnamed)	MANUAL REVIEW	1975 m	1.00	similar names within the same area
(unnamed)	MANUAL REVIEW	1945 m	1.00	similar names within the same area
(unnamed)	MANUAL REVIEW	1179 m	1.00	similar names within the same area
(unnamed)	MANUAL REVIEW	1807 m	1.00	similar names within the same area
(unnamed)	MANUAL REVIEW	1943 m	1.00	similar names within the same area
(unnamed)	MANUAL REVIEW	1723 m	1.00	similar names within the same area
(unnamed)	MANUAL REVIEW	1670 m	1.00	similar names within the same area
(unnamed)	MANUAL REVIEW	1546 m	1.00	similar names within the same area
(unnamed)	MANUAL REVIEW	1990 m	1.00	similar names within the same area
(unnamed)	MANUAL REVIEW	1745 m	1.00	similar names within the same area
(unnamed)	MANUAL REVIEW	1824 m	1.00	similar names within the same area
(unnamed)	MANUAL REVIEW	1993 m	1.00	similar names within the same area
(unnamed)	MANUAL REVIEW	1924 m	1.00	similar names within the same area

Where every value came from

Provenance is kept per field, not per record, so a venue whose name came from one source and whose phone came from another can still be audited value by value.

Field	Value	Source	Confidence	Current
geom	{"lat":33.8935676,"lng":35.4971043}	osm	0.75	✓
sports	["tennis"]	osm	0.50	✓
venue_subtype	"tennis_court"	osm	0.30	✓

Sources and licences

Provider	Role	Record	Snapshot	Licence	Attribution
osm	canonical	way/529578917	2026-08-29T19:10:41Z	ODbL-1.0	© OpenStreetMap contributors